Leeway Research

Investment thesis 8 min

Grid Build-out, CBAM and Labour Shift European Industrial Returns

The issue is not only who builds transformers. Certified labour, testing capacity and protected materials determine where the bottleneck is paid.

The assessment is produced by a discussion among several models, with continuous fact-checking and research. Jump to the method

Everyone is looking for the "next European defence" trade. This analysis examines whether certified human hours, carbon tariff walls and restricted assets offer a less crowded way to study industrial returns in the late 2020s.

The Thesis at a Glance

  • The regulatory question: New ESG or regulatory rules may change which sectors investors can own, but permission alone does not create durable earnings.
  • The possible bottleneck: The energy transition may be constrained less by equipment than by certified human labour. This analysis therefore examines companies that provide or organise specialised technical work.
  • The carbon question: EU carbon rules (CBAM) may improve the relative position of European basic-material producers, but the timing and effect remain uncertain.
  • The central test: The analysis examines cash-generating assets facing restrictions and asks whether physical constraints could eventually change the rules.

The argument

The Illusion of the "Regulatory Unlock"

Every investor is currently asking the same question: What is the next European defence trade?

Between 2022 and 2026, European defence stocks experienced a historic explosion in value. Now, the market is desperately running screens to find the next sector poised for a similar boom. Mostly, they are looking for regulatory unlocks—moments when a previously "taboo" sector is suddenly deemed acceptable by ESG mandates or index rules, triggering a flood of passive ETF money.

This is a trap.

History shows that permission to invest is not a mandate to buy. When a sector is suddenly labeled "investable" by new ESG rules, Wall Street event desks front-run the news. By the time the rule actually changes, the real money has already been made.

The ESG unlock was the amplifier of the defence boom, but it wasn't the engine. The engine was simple: Governments were forced to buy multi-year, non-substitutable military supplies from a physical supply chain that couldn't expand fast enough.

If you want to find the next massive winner, you have to stop looking for regulatory rule changes. You have to look for physical execution bottlenecks.

The Real Bottleneck: Certified Human Hours

The market is obsessing over the equipment needed for the energy transition. But equipment models are fundamentally flawed because they ignore the true gating factor of the 2020s: certified human hours.

Right now, billions of dollars are flowing into the companies that manufacture high-voltage cables, transformers, and grid equipment. But there is a fatal flaw in this trade: Who is going to install it all?

What actually converts a funded government order into a working power grid? It requires high-voltage commissioning engineers, code-certified pressure welders, linesmen, and test-hall technicians.

  • These professions require multi-year certification cycles.
  • The workforce is aging rapidly.
  • Immigration politics heavily restrict the influx of new talent.

You can order a thousand transformers, but you cannot mass-produce a certified welder.

How to trade this:
The analysis therefore compares crowded equipment manufacturers with companies that own or organise "certified hours."
Look for the companies that own or manufacture these certified hours:

  1. Testing, Inspection, and Certification (TIC) firms.
  2. Technical services companies with captive, certified crews.
  3. Factory-built modular substation creators (companies that build the infrastructure in a factory to avoid needing scarce laborers on the actual construction site).

These businesses are currently hidden inside boring service conglomerates, trading at very reasonable valuations (10–15x EBIT). Because there is no flashy "Thematic ETF" for them, they remain cheap.

The Tariff Wall: How Carbon Rules Protect EU Materials

The second major opportunity lies in European basic materials—specifically fertilizer, aluminum, steel, and cement.

For years, European heavy industry has been crushed by high energy costs and cheap imports. But a massive shift is happening via the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). In plain English, CBAM is a carbon tariff.

Starting around 2029–31, the EU will aggressively phase out "free" carbon allowances for domestic producers, but simultaneously enforce strict carbon taxes on foreign imports. This turns carbon costs from a pure burden into a protective tariff wall.

Combined with the fact that many European factories permanently closed between 2024 and 2026, the surviving EU producers are about to see a massive restoration of pricing power.

How to trade this:
This is an earnings-only trade. You buy these companies now for their dividends and hold them as their earnings normalize behind this new tariff wall. Plan to exit when their earnings peak. Do not expect their valuation multiples to skyrocket—high energy costs will always keep a ceiling on how expensive these stocks can get.

Where the analysis looks beyond consensus

If you want to own defence and power, you have to move away from the crowded consensus.

A. Defence "Diffusion"

The major defence prime contractors are currently very expensive (trading at 25–40x EBIT). They are highly vulnerable to negative headlines (like a sudden ceasefire) or manufacturing delays. Instead, look at "defence diffusion"—the unglamorous side of the military. This includes sustainment, maintenance (MRO), naval shipyards, counter-drone tech, and test-and-evaluation facilities. These trade at much cheaper valuations and will continue to grow their earnings just by maintaining existing military assets, even if new weapons procurement slows down.

B. Behind-the-Meter Power

The public power grid is politically capped. Governments cannot endlessly raise electricity bills to fund grid expansions without losing elections. Because the main grid is clogged and rationing connections, massive electricity consumers (like AI data centers and heavy industry) are being forced to build their own private power setups—known as "behind-the-meter" power. The winners here are the manufacturers of on-site generators, medium-voltage switchgear, and temporary power solutions.

The Value Traps: What to Avoid

Regulated Network Owners (Utilities)

Avoid them. They face a nightmare scenario: The government caps how much profit they can make, but their costs for equipment and labor are uncapped and rising. To fund their growth, they have to constantly issue new stock, which dilutes the value for existing shareholders.

Tier-1 Grid Equipment Makers

The market loves them right now, but they are a trap. The massive wave of grid expansion planned for 2027–2030 will be severely delayed by the labor shortages mentioned above. When those delays hit, these expensive stocks will drop back down to normal industrial valuations.

The Master Strategy: The "Exclusion Cycle"

Let's examine a repeatable framework for industrial markets this decade. We call it the Exclusion Cycle.

One possible source of mispricing is the regulatory imposition calendar—the schedule of things governments are trying to ban, restrict, or heavily regulate.

Right now, regulators are drafting rules to restrict:

  • PFAS (so-called "forever chemicals")
  • Seabed and hard-rock mining
  • Water usage for AI data centers
  • Autonomous weapon components

When regulators target a sector, the market panics. The assets become "taboo" or "unownable," and their stock prices crash.

But here is the secret: Regulators can write all the rules they want, but they cannot change physical reality. If the modern economy physically needs those chemicals, that copper, or that water to function, the constraint will eventually break. The rules will have to be softened, or the few remaining legal suppliers will gain absolute monopoly pricing power.

The approach: The analysis examines cash-generating assets facing restrictions and tests whether physical constraints could eventually change the rules. That outcome is uncertain, so the position requires a clear time horizon and defined risks.

You cannot time exactly when the regulations will break—but physical reality always wins in the end.

The stock recommendations in this analysis

For this research topic, the discussion among several models selected the following stocks as the more interesting positions. The ratings attached to each company come from Leeway’s general equity analysis and are independent of this topic.

The Business-Rating scores the quality of the business model, independent of the share price. The Market-Fit-Rating tests eighteen fundamental figures for how well the company currently fits the market; a negative reading implies expected negative performance. The Cycle-Rating places the valuation in the stock’s own history: a higher figure means the shares are historically cheaper. The Leeway-Score combines the three in equal parts. How the ratings are calculated

The recommendations since publication

From 2 September 2026 to 19 October 2026: Portfolio+1.1%ACWI-1.3%

The Execution Layer: Monetising Certified Hours

Long

The capital-supply unlock will compound in the layer that owns or manufactures certified human hours, rather than in crowded equipment manufacturers.

SPIE SA

SPIE.PA · Industrials · 7bn EUR

Long

Role in thesis: The purest listed monetiser of certified human hours in Europe.

Valuation context: Its scarce input—certified technical crews—is the exact constraint gating the entire electrification and resilience buildout. Yet, the market currently prices SPIE as an ordinary services roll-up rather than as a provider of bottleneck capacity.

Invalidation risk: The thesis fails if labour costs stay with SPIE rather than being passed to clients, if organic growth slows below mid-single digits, or if tier-1 equipment manufacturers and utilities successfully internalise field crews.

Leeway Rating

General scores - independent of the research topic

Leeway Score32.4/100

  • Business Rating 36.0
  • Market-Fit Rating Trend−627.5
  • Cycle Rating 33.8

Check the full analysis

Bureau Veritas

BVI.PA · Industrials · 12bn EUR

Long

Role in thesis: A structurally strong owner of a licensing and human-capacity bottleneck.

Valuation context: The share price has broadly moved sideways for years while earnings have grown, resulting in multiple compression. The demand it serves—infrastructure, defence quality assurance, and carbon verification—is non-discretionary and regulation-driven.

Invalidation risk: The thesis fails if pricing power fails to show in organic growth, or if clients broadly defer certification during a severe capex downturn.

Leeway Rating

General scores - independent of the research topic

Leeway Score39.3/100

  • Business Rating 45.0
  • Market-Fit Rating Trend−231.8
  • Cycle Rating 41.0

Check the full analysis

Georg Fischer

GF.SW · Industrials · 5bn CHF

Long

Role in thesis: The prefabrication and water leg of the execution layer, moving scarce labour hours off-site.

Valuation context: It is cheap relative to its end-market growth. It is exposed to two non-discretionary payers—data-centre cooling and water-network renewal—but trades without the thematic premium usually attached to those sectors.

Invalidation risk: The thesis fails if European building and construction activity stays depressed longer than expected, or if the recent Uponor integration disappoints on margins.

Leeway Rating

General scores - independent of the research topic

Leeway Score11.4/100

  •    
  • Market-Fit Rating Trend+123.9
  • Cycle Rating 30.1

Check the full analysis

Your knowledge edge

Understand the real drivers of our portfolio

Look behind the scenes: see not only what we buy, but why. Get the complete view of our strategy.

  • Every position revealed: Access each holding in our portfolio.
  • Understand the investment thesis: See the exact role each security plays in our return.
  • See the connections: Analyse our long and short strategies in direct context.

How this analysis is produced

The assessment is produced in several steps. Independent model families answer the same question separately and then attack the results. What you read here has survived several rounds.

  1. Two independent first theses. The same opening question goes to several model families that cannot see one another. Disagreements are kept, not averaged away.
  2. Dated evidence. Every claim that depends on facts is broken into individual search questions and answered with dated, sourced web research. Question, answer, sources and timestamp are logged and remain traceable.
  3. Adversarial review. Several review roles attack the thesis from different angles: one hunts for the strongest refutation, one for the awkward edge cases, one tests whether a path from thesis to share price exists at all, one checks the timeline for contradictions. Each role raises its own questions, which are again answered with evidence.
  4. Merge, then the next round. The surviving theses are merged into one and attacked again. The counter-position and the unresolved tension on this page come out of that step. They were not bolted on afterwards to look balanced.
  5. Back to the start. The process runs again until there is a clear result and a list of tradable companies with structural advantages.

Any analysis can be wrong. That is why the falsification criteria and the counter-position sit on the same page as the thesis, not in the small print.

The numbers shown against individual companies do not come from this process. The Business-Rating scores business-model quality, the Market-Fit-Rating eighteen fundamental figures against the current market, the Cycle-Rating the valuation against the stock’s own history. They are documented under the Leeway scores.

Evaluate the analyzed stocks with the three Leeway ratings

The Business-Rating assesses business model quality, the Market-Fit-Rating evaluates fundamentals in the current market regime, and the Cycle-Rating contextualizes valuation within historical cycles. Test all company analyses free for fourteen days, or connect the data directly to your AI assistant.

Company Valuation and Fundamental Analysis

The data is recalculated on a weekly basis and depends on the current market value of the company and the balance sheet figures of the annual financial statements. The market value changes continuously with price changes, the balance sheets are created annually and change the valuation massively. The time of the annual financial statements and the metrics used can be viewed under "Metrics". Further information on how the analyses work can be found as tooltips directly on the analyses as well as in our explanations.

General

The information is intended to support you in your independent decision-making in implementing investment strategies and serves purely informational purposes. Past performance is not a reliable indication of future performance. No warranty can be given for the completeness, correctness and accuracy of the listed content. The information does not constitute specific investment recommendations. We neither know you nor your financial situation and do not provide investment advice. Only licensed investment advisors with knowledge of your personal circumstances may do this. PWP Leeway UG (limited liability) is not an investment advisor and does not collect any personal data for the purpose of investment optimization. PWP Leeway UG (limited liability) is a provider of investment recommendations and investment strategy recommendations. As such, it is registered with and supervised by the Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin). The legal notices on the use of the website and the General Terms and Conditions of PWP Leeway UG (limited liability) also apply.

All price data are closing prices of the respective stock exchanges. Price information and master data are provided by an external service provider. Furthermore, public trading data, such as provided by Finra.org, is used to analyze market behavior. No warranty can be given for the completeness, correctness and accuracy of the listed content.

Disclosure of interests: To the best of our knowledge, Leeway and the persons responsible for creating or publishing the respective content do not hold a net long or net short position exceeding 0.5% of the issued share capital of any issuer discussed in that content at the time of publication. There are no other interests or business relationships that could conflict with objectivity, unless expressly stated otherwise in the respective content.

© Leeway
PWP Leeway UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
Leeway Icon