

Scores at time of recommendation (June 22, 2026)
2021
SLB formalized an energy-transition strategy, committing to a 2050 net-zero target (including Scope 3) and launching Transition Technologies and New Energy initiatives, including hydrogen electrolyzer pilots, to complement core oilfield services [1].
Investors began viewing SLB not merely as a cyclical oil-services contractor but as a hybrid energy-technology platform combining digital and decarbonization capabilities, though early skepticism around execution persisted [1].
The post-COVID recovery drove industry-wide activity rebound. SLB moved from pandemic troughs into sustained recovery across multiple quarters [1].
2022
On 18 March, SLB suspended new investment and technology deployment in Russia following the Ukraine invasion [11].
On 24 October, SLB rebranded from "Schlumberger" to "SLB" with a new logo to underscore its energy-innovation strategy [23][1].
Employee and draft-related issues surfaced alongside Russia reputational scrutiny throughout the year [15][18].
The rebrand reinforced the energy-innovation and digital narrative, though continued operational presence and complexities in Russia introduced geopolitical and political-risk considerations into investor pricing [23][11][15].
Ukraine-driven volatility dominated the first half of 2022, producing sharp moves. Afterward, the tape turned choppy and sideways as markets balanced the transition narrative against geopolitical risk [1].
2023
On 2 October, SLB closed the OneSubsea joint venture with Aker Solutions and Subsea7 (SLB holding 70%), consolidating significant subsea scale and capability [36].
Mid-2023 saw SLB expand restrictions and halt shipments into Russia as sanctions widened, affecting operations and controls [19][11].
Investors rewarded the subsea scale and technology story alongside execution on portfolio reshaping, while monitoring sanction compliance and integration risk [36][19].
The chart formed a consolidation range with intermittent strength around JV and transaction headlines, establishing a base ahead of the 2024 earnings-driven move [36][1].
2024
On 2 April, SLB announced an all-stock agreement to acquire ChampionX (chemicals, artificial lift, and production technology) as a strategic bolt-on to Production Systems [1].
Full-year 2024 revenue reached approximately $36.29B (roughly 10% year-over-year growth), with solid free cash flow of approximately $4.0B and expanded margins [1].
Q4 2024 included asset impairments and merger-integration charges [1].
On 17 October, SLB entered an agreement to sell its Palliser APS interest for approximately $430M [1].
The 2024 narrative reinforced SLB as a cash-generative operator executing both capital returns (dividend increases and buybacks) and strategic M&A to shift the portfolio toward production-focused businesses. Impairment headlines created near-term sentiment headwinds but did not erode confidence in free cash flow generation [1].
A broad uptrend developed through Q3 driven by earnings and backlog conversion. Q4 impairments and charges created intraday and multi-week volatility, though overall price action reflected rotation back into stocks showing clear fundamental improvement [1].
2025
The ChampionX acquisition closed in 2025, with ChampionX shareholders becoming meaningful SLB holders—a milestone SLB described as defining for the year [5].
In mid-January, SLB reported Q4 results, raised the quarterly dividend, and announced accelerated share repurchases totaling approximately $2.3B, triggering an immediate positive market reaction with shares jumping roughly 7% [1][7].
Management signaled near-term oil oversupply and guided for largely flat 2025 revenue [7].
Investor sentiment split between total-return and income-focused buyers embracing the rising dividend and large ASR, and growth-cautious investors digesting oversupply guidance. The stock became positioned as a higher-quality cyclical operator with shareholder-friendly capital returns [7][5][1].
A sharp gap-up rally with high volume occurred in mid-January on the earnings beat and ASR/dividend announcement, followed by a multi-month range as markets balanced buyback-driven demand against cautious guidance [7][1].
2026 (year-to-date through 7 July)
SLB continued ChampionX integration and capital allocation discipline, announcing another dividend increase in January 2026—the fifth consecutive annual raise—and emphasizing continued buyback and dividend cadence in proxy filings [5].
The dominant investor view treats SLB as a hybrid: a cash-generative, cyclical oilfield and production-systems leader investing in digital and new-energy adjacencies, with valuation anchored on free cash flow yield, dividend growth, and successful M&A integration [1][5].
The chart pattern since the January 2025 ASR and earnings pop has shown range-to-gradual-up movement with renewed uptick interest around continued buybacks and dividend actions. Investors watch for confirmation of ChampionX synergies and next earnings beats to drive sustained breakout from the post-2025 trading band [5][1].
SLB is transitioning away from the valuation profile of a traditional oilfield services company. It's systematically building a software and AI business that delivers higher margins, recurring revenue, and structurally lower cyclicality than its traditional core operations. The Delfi platform, the Nvidia partnership, and the newly launched SLB Digital Marketplace aren't marketing exercises—they're operationally measurable: digital ARR exceeding $1 billion, autonomous drilling cutting well time in half on real projects. Meanwhile, ChampionX is diversifying its revenue base toward production chemicals and artificial lift, both less dependent on exploration capex cycles. The recent 15% pullback from monthly highs reads more tactically driven than fundamentally sound, given that near-term headwinds from the Middle East have already been quantified and communicated. Consensus analyst price targets of $62.36 imply nearly 30% upside without requiring an oil price boom.
Schlumberger stands as the world's largest oilfield services and technology provider, operating across drilling, well services, reservoir characterization, production and subsea engineering. It faces competition from integrated service and equipment firms—Halliburton, Baker Hughes, NOV, TechnipFMC, Weatherford—alongside specialist subsea contractors like Subsea 7, where the battleground centers on price, technology capability and project execution. The business carries real exposure: cyclicality tied to oil and gas capital spending, relentless pricing and technology pressure, execution risk on large projects, supply-chain vulnerability, and the lengthening shadow of regulatory tightening and energy transition dynamics.
Schlumberger competes in a concentrated global oilfield-services market dominated by Halliburton and Baker Hughes, with meaningful secondary players including NOV, Weatherford, TechnipFMC and KBR. The competitive landscape spans drilling, completions, reservoir evaluation, subsea and digital services, though Schlumberger also contends with regional specialists and the in-house service operations of national oil companies. The business carries material headwinds: commodity price cyclicality that swings E&P capital spending, geopolitical and regulatory risk concentrated in key producing regions, persistent margin compression from competition, and the longer-term structural question of energy transition and ESG constraints on demand.
| Company | Ticker |
|---|---|
| Halliburton Company | HAL.NYSE |
| Baker Hughes Company | BKR.NASDAQ |
| NOV Inc. | NOV.NYSE |
| TechnipFMC plc | FTI.NYSE |
| KBR Inc. | KBR.NYSE |
| Weatherford International plc | WFRD.NASDAQ |
Receive hand-picked stock recommendations with detailed analyses every week
Start Free Trial| Period | Schlumberger NV | vs DAX | vs S&P 500 (SPY) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | -16.68% | -19.53% | -18.28% |
| 3M | -11.41% | -17.16% | -22.26% |
| 6M | +4.05% | +2.71% | -4.93% |
| 1Y | +34.39% | +28.61% | +12.63% |
| 3Y | -7.52% | -70.72% | -84.43% |
| 5Y | +67.16% | +2.02% | -18.43% |
Receive hand-picked stock recommendations with detailed analyses every week
Start Free TrialHow the company’s key valuation ratios (P/E, P/S, P/B and P/CF) have evolved over time compared to today.
| Period | P/E Ratio | P/S Ratio | P/B Ratio | P/CF Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current | 21.0 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 11.0 |
| 1Y ago | 11.9 | 1.4 | 2.5 | 7.3 |
| 3Y ago | 18.0 | 2.3 | 3.7 | 13.8 |
| 5Y ago | 43.3 | 2.0 | 3.4 | 14.7 |
Long-term record of paid dividends (amount per share and dividend yield at the time of payment).
| Year | Dividend | Yield at payment | Avg. yield |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.30 USD | 0.52% | 0.6% |
| 2026 | 0.30 USD | 0.59% | |
| 2025 | 0.29 USD | 0.78% | |
| 2025 | 0.29 USD | 0.79% | |
| 2025 | 0.29 USD | 0.84% | |
| 2025 | 0.29 USD | 0.69% | |
| 2024 | 0.28 USD | 0.63% | |
| 2024 | 0.28 USD | 0.65% | |
| 2024 | 0.28 USD | 0.63% | |
| 2024 | 0.28 USD | 0.57% | |
| 2023 | 0.25 USD | 0.48% | |
| 2023 | 0.25 USD | 0.42% | |
| 2023 | 0.25 USD | 0.54% | |
| 2023 | 0.25 USD | 0.47% | |
| 2022 | 0.18 USD | 0.34% |
Historical earnings performance shows how consistently the company meets or exceeds analyst expectations. Forward estimates provide insight into expected profitability and growth trajectory.
Selected income statement, balance sheet and cash flow figures. Annual and quarterly, based on reported IFRS/GAAP financials.
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 35.71B | 36.29B | 33.13B | 28.09B | 22.93B |
| Operating income (EBIT) | 5.46B | 6.33B | 5.50B | 4.15B | 2.77B |
| Net income | 3.35B | 4.46B | 4.20B | 3.44B | 1.88B |
| Free cash flow | 4.79B | 4.47B | 4.54B | 2.00B | 3.47B |
| Total assets | 54.87B | 48.94B | 47.96B | 43.13B | 41.51B |
| Equity | 26.11B | 21.13B | 20.19B | 17.68B | 15.00B |
| Net debt | 9.27B | 8.53B | 9.06B | 10.57B | 12.44B |