

Explore by topic
May–Aug 2021
Siemens Gamesa issued profit warnings and operational setbacks; Siemens Energy trimmed its FY2021 sales outlook (May 5) and later pulled margin guidance amid Gamesa's problems (July). Management publicly signalled disappointment with the wind unit (August). [1], [4], [3]
Market perception shifted from a clean energy-transition growth story to concern about execution risk at the wind division. The group was increasingly viewed as a conglomerate with a single problematic division dragging results. Sharp mid-2021 drawdown and elevated volatility followed; price moved into a lower range after the warnings. [1], [4], [3]
FY 2021 (reported 10 Nov 2021)
Siemens Energy reported its first full fiscal-year results since the carve-out: net loss (≈€560m) driven by special items and Gamesa losses, though adjusted EBITA improved versus prior year. [10]
Investors acknowledged operational improvement in conventional businesses but remained cautious because Gamesa losses and integration costs still weighed on group earnings. Stabilization and range-trading emerged as relief from earlier sell-offs met with continued caution. [10]
Mar 2022
Leadership churn at Siemens Gamesa followed continued profit warnings—the Gamesa CEO resigned amid recurring project delays and cost overruns. [9]
This reinforced the view that the wind unit suffered structural execution problems; confidence in a near-term fix waned. Renewed downtrend and heightened volatility centered on the wind-division narrative. [9]
22 Jun 2023
Ad-hoc disclosure: Siemens Energy withdrew its FY2023 profit guidance after an extended technical review found a substantial increase in failure rates on Siemens Gamesa's onshore 4.X and 5.X platforms. Initial remediation cost estimates exceeded €1bn. [31]
Market shock transformed investor perception from "fixable integration issues" to a full-blown product-quality crisis with multi-year financial consequences. Immediate, severe sell-off and breakdown from prior trading ranges followed. [31], [24]
Aug 2023 (Q3 disclosure)
Siemens Energy quantified the problem: a task force was established (including external advisers), charges were booked and remediation costs formally recognised (~€1.6bn in direct remediation and broader charges). [30], [22], [33]
The crisis moved from headline shock to quantified liability. Investors focused on remediation costs, warranty exposure and balance-sheet risk. Continued downtrend with episodic short squeezes occurred as markets absorbed escalating charge numbers. [30], [33]
Nov 14–15, 2023
Group reported a record FY2023 net loss (≈€4.6bn) driven mainly by Gamesa quality. A state-backed stabilisation package was agreed: a €15bn suite of guarantees with ~€7.5bn counter-guarantee from the German government and commitments from banks and stakeholders. [18], [39], [50]
The episode became systemic. State support signalled the scale of the problem but also reduced immediate solvency and default risk; perceptions split between "government-backstopped" recovery and lingering execution risk at Gamesa. Deep multi-month drawdown bottomed out around the bailout, followed by a volatile relief spike on the rescue announcement. [18], [39]
21 Nov 2023
Siemens Gamesa announced a turnaround plan with cost cuts and capacity adjustments. Market reaction called the plan underwhelming and shares fell on execution doubts. [16]
Investors viewed announced measures as necessary but insufficient in scope and timing—skepticism about speed and effectiveness of remediation persisted. Short-term pullback followed the initial bailout relief; trading resumed with elevated volatility. [16]
8 May–late May 2024
Siemens Energy reported a stronger quarter and raised full-year revenue, profit and cash-flow outlook (revised revenue growth to ~10–12% for 2024). A management change at Siemens Gamesa was announced (Vinod Philip to take operational leadership); Gamesa also announced major job cuts (~4,100). [54], [56], [65]
Momentum shifted: confidence returned in the group's healthy grid and gas businesses and in management's willingness to restructure Gamesa. The stock narrative moved toward "stabilisation and restructuring" rather than outright failure. Sustained rally and transition to uptrend followed as markets priced improving fundamentals and visible cost actions. [54], [56], [65]
13 Nov 2024 (FY/Q4 2024 reporting)
Siemens Energy reported results consistent with its raised outlook; management commentary stated objectives were met for fiscal 2024. [67]
The recovery narrative was reinforced—core businesses (Grid Technologies, Gas Services) performed strongly while Gamesa remediation continued. Investor focus shifted to execution and cash-flow recovery. Continued uptrend and trend confirmation followed as volatility eased and earnings momentum aligned with guidance. [67]
5 Jun 2025
Siemens Energy replaced the earlier government-backed €11bn funding facility with a new €9bn bank facility and retained a government counter-guarantee (~€7.5bn). This marked a key step in de-risking the company's financing package and enabled a pathway toward normalized capital policy. [40], [44]
Market read this as meaningful de-leveraging of the crisis era. Perception moved toward "balance-sheet repair and eventual shareholder returns" while Gamesa remediation remained a multi-year process. Breakout from prior consolidation followed as credit-risk uncertainty receded and risk premium compressed. [40], [44]
11 Jul 2026
Siemens Energy (ENR.XETRA) trading at 152.12.
By mid-2026 the stock is priced against a narrative of a partially healed balance sheet, improving core business cash flows and ongoing Gamesa remediation. Investors treat the name as a recovering industrial and energy infrastructure play but still monitor wind-unit tail risk. Price behavior is consistent with an extended recovery and uptrend from the 2023 crisis lows, entering phases of consolidation as investors await continued execution and cash-flow proof points. [54], [67], [40], [44]
Siemens Energy operates across three main domains—gas and steam turbines, transmission and distribution infrastructure, and wind energy through Siemens Gamesa—where it faces competition from both diversified industrial conglomerates and specialized equipment makers. General Electric competes directly in generation and aftermarket services; ABB, Schneider Electric, and Hitachi vie for grid and electrification work; Vestas dominates wind. Competition plays out globally and within each segment distinctly. The company's risk structure rests on four pillars. Large projects demand flawless execution and carry extended warranty obligations. Utility capital spending cycles remain inherently volatile, and working capital can tighten sharply. Competitors—including manufacturers operating at lower cost bases—press margins continuously. Beyond that sit regulatory shifts, supply-chain disruptions, and geopolitical moves that can fundamentally alter project returns before a contract even closes.
Siemens Energy operates across three distinct markets—gas and steam turbines, grid and transmission equipment, and onshore and offshore wind—where different competitors lead in each. The competitive landscape includes listed players like General Electric, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, ABB and Vestas, alongside significant private competitors such as Ansaldo Energia and Enercon. The company faces material risks centered on execution in its wind business and warranty exposure, coupled with relentless competition across multiple fronts that erodes margins. Large project cycles create working capital strain, while regulatory shifts, policy changes and supply chain vulnerabilities can delay delivery or inflate costs.
| Company | Ticker |
|---|---|
| General Electric Company | GE.NYSE |
| ABB Ltd | ABBN.SIX |
Receive hand-picked stock recommendations with detailed analyses every week
Start Free Trial| Period | Siemens Energy AG | vs DAX | vs S&P 500 (SPY) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | +3.48% | -0.06% | +0.89% |
| 3M | -9.03% | -14.34% | -20.43% |
| 6M | +19.16% | +20.49% | +9.98% |
| 1Y | +66.63% | +63.28% | +44.23% |
| 3Y | +881.17% | +824.73% | +805.47% |
| 5Y | +489.78% | +431.03% | +404.97% |
Receive hand-picked stock recommendations with detailed analyses every week
Start Free TrialHow the company’s key valuation ratios (P/E, P/S, P/B and P/CF) have evolved over time compared to today.
| Period | P/E Ratio | P/S Ratio | P/B Ratio | P/CF Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current | 59.5 | 3.3 | 12.3 | 17.0 |
| 1Y ago | 82.9 | 2.1 | 7.8 | 14.5 |
| 3Y ago | -3.9 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 5.3 |
| 5Y ago | -36.0 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 10.7 |
Long-term record of paid dividends (amount per share and dividend yield at the time of payment).
| Year | Dividend | Yield at payment | Avg. yield |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.70 EUR | 0.42% | 0.49% |
| 2023 | 0.10 EUR | 0.55% | |
| 2022 | 0.10 EUR | 0.51% |
Historical earnings performance shows how consistently the company meets or exceeds analyst expectations. Forward estimates provide insight into expected profitability and growth trajectory.
Selected income statement, balance sheet and cash flow figures. Annual and quarterly, based on reported IFRS/GAAP financials.
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 39.08B | 34.47B | 31.12B | 29.00B | 28.48B |
| Operating income (EBIT) | 1.57B | 2.13B | -3.26B | -489.00M | -357.00M |
| Net income | 1.41B | 1.18B | -4.53B | -647.00M | -560.00M |
| Free cash flow | 4.10B | 1.38B | 394.00M | 1.06B | 959.00M |
| Total assets | 56.64B | 50.87B | 47.91B | 51.17B | 44.14B |
| Equity | 10.30B | 9.07B | 8.50B | 17.19B | 14.96B |
| Net debt | -5.20B | -2.60B | 193.00M | -2.74B | -2.60B |